VIRGINIA AS A ROYAL
PROVINCE, 1624-1763.
Government of the Royal Province of Virginia.
After the dissolution of the London Company,
affairs were very much depressed in the colony on account of the
uncertainty attending land titles and even the form of government. King
James declared that he did not intend to disturb the interest of either
planter or adventurer, but as he subsequently appointed a commission
consisting of opponents to the Company to take charge, temporarily, of
Virginia affairs the people did not know exactly what to expect. Serious
fears were entertained as to the fate of the representative government,
which they had enjoyed under the Company; for while the then governor, Sir
Francis Wyatt, and twelve others in Virginia as councillors were
authorized to conduct the local government, no summons went out for an
assembly. King James, however, died March 27, 1625, and by his death the
commission for Virginia affairs in England expired.
Charles I. had all the arbitrary notions of
his father, but fortunately he was under personal obligations to Sir Edwin
Sandys and Nicholas Ferrar, Jr., and for their sake he dismissed the
former royal commissioners and intrusted affairs relative to Virginia to a
committee of the Privy Council friendly to the old Company. The Virginians
sent George Yeardley to England, and as the result of his representations
he was returned as governor; and not long after, on March 26, 1628, under
instructions from the King, the regular law-making body again assembled at
Jamestown-an event second only in importance to the original meeting in
1619. It seems that the division of the General Assembly into two
chambers-the council sitting as an upper house and the representatives of
the people sitting as the lower house in imitation of the houses of
Parliament-dates from this period. Never again were the regular sessions
of the law-making body interrupted, and the Virginians, practically left.
to themselves by the King, enjoyed a larger share of free government than
could have been possible under the Company.
Claiborne's Struggle for Territorial
Integrity.
The question of land titles was kept in
uncertainty for a much longer period. Despite the assurances of King
James, which were repeated by his son, Charles I., the colonists and those
interested in England were soon given to understand that the privileges of
the planters and adventurers did not extend to unoccupied lands. On Oct.
30, 1629, the King granted to Sir Robert Heath the province of Carolina in
the southern part of Virginia between 31 and 36 degrees. And about the
same time Cottington, the secretary of state, in answer to an application
from George Calvert, Lord Baltimore, promised him "any part of Virginia
not already granted." Soon after on the death of George Calvert, a charter
was made out on June 20, 1632, to his son, Cecilius Calvert, for that part
of Virginia lying north of the Potomac, which was called Maryland.
It happened, however, that William Claiborne,
the secretary of state of Virginia, under the authority of the King, had
established within the limits of the proposed province, in 1631, a trading
post on Kent Island, which was recognized by the Virginia authorities as a
legal occupation. Backed by the Virginia authorities and the members of
the old Company, Claiborne disputed the validity of Baltimore's grant, and
when this was decided against him by the commissioners for foreign
plantations, he contested the point as to Kent Island itself, holding it
to be expressly excepted by the terms of the charter, which described the
land given to Lord Baltimore as "hitherto unsettled and occupied only by
barbarians ignorant of God." The government in England vacillated from one
side to the other, and as a result there was a miniature war in which
several persons were killed in Chesapeake Bay. Great excitement prevailed
in both colonies, and in Virginia much indignation was felt against the
governor, Harvey, who upheld the cause of the Marylanders, and in his
general conduct reflected the views of the court party in England. He
acted in important matters without the consent of his council, which was
contrary to his instructions; he attempted to lay taxes and suppressed a
petition addressed to the King by the Assembly on the tobacco contract.
Matters came to a crisis in April, 1635, when the council turned Harvey
out of office and shipped him back to England.
This deposition of a royal governor mightily
surprised King Charles, who declared it an act of "regal authority." He
restored Harvey to his government, and on April 4, 1638, the commissioners
for foreign plantations rendered a report giving Kent Island and the right
of trade in Chesapeake Bay wholly to Lord Baltimore, and leaving all
personal wrongs between the parties to be redressed by the courts.
This territorial question at last seemed
settled, but in the vicissitudes of English politics King Charles soon
found it wise to once more turn a favorable ear to the friends of the old
Company, and on Jan. 16, 1639, Sir Francis Wyatt, who had governed in
Virginia acceptably once before, was commissioned to succeed Harvey. The
agitation for a renewal of the charter was resumed and George Sandys was
sent to England as agent for the colony to present to the King the wishes
of the people. But soon another change in politics ensued by the breach
between King and Parliament, and Sandys, despairing of success with the
King, appealed to the Parliament, and the Virginia patent was taken out
again "under the broad seal of England."
To offset these proceedings the King
commissioned Sir William Berkeley, a vehement royalist, as successor to
the popular Wyatt, and he arrived in Virginia in January, 1642. Under his
influence the General Assembly changed views, and a petition against the
restoration of the Company was presented to Charles at his headquarters in
York on July 5, 1642. He returned a gracious reply that "he had not the
least intention to consent to the introduction of any Company."
The civil war between the King and Parliament
greatly influenced affairs in America. The inhabitants of Kent Island were
Protestants and were restless under the new authority of Lord Baltimore,
who was a Catholic. As a consequence civil war ensued in Maryland between
the Protestant and Catholic factions. In Virginia the Indians, encouraged
by the rumors of war in England, attacked the colonists and killed over
300. Nevertheless, Lord Baltimore in Maryland and Sir William Berkeley in
Virginia managed to assert their authority over Indians and
Parliamentarians alike. In Maryland the chief agitator, Ingle, was
expelled, and in Virginia the savages, by the activity of Claiborne and
other officers, were driven far away into the forests. Old Opechancanough,
the Indian chief, was captured, and peace was not long after made with
Necotowance, his successor, by which the Indians agreed to retire entirely
from the peninsula between the York and James rivers, and from the south
side of James River as far as the Black Water.
In 1649 Maryland was the gainer by an
emigration from Virginia of over 1,000 Puritans, who would not accept the
forms of the Church of England; but Virginia did not feel the drain
because of the much larger accession to her numbers through the civil war
in England. These new people were not like many of the old settlers,
servants who went thither to make tobacco, but English yeomen, merchants
and gentlemen, frequently of great estates and influential family
connections, who crossed the seas to make homes. Tobacco planting was, in
fact, no longer much of a temptation, as the price had fallen from 10
shillings a pound in 1612 to one penny a pound in 1642.
Commonwealth Period in Virginia.
The execution of King Charles in 1649 caused
much excitement in Virginia, and under the influence of the immigrant
cavaliers Sir William Berkeley denounced the murder, and the General
Assembly declared it treason either to defend the late proceedings or to
doubt the right of his son, Charles II., to succeed to the crown.
This was bold talk, but the challenge thus
tendered was not unnoticed by Parliament very long. In October, 1651, was
passed the first of the navigation acts which limited the colonial trade
to England, banishing from Virginia the Dutch vessels which hitherto
carried abroad most of the exports. About the same time having taken
measures against Barbadoes, the council of state ordered a squadron to be
prepared to reduce Virginia and Maryland. Thomas Stegge, Richard Bennett
and William Claiborne, members of Berkeley's council, were made
commissioners, and the result was that in March, 1652, when the fleet
appeared before Jamestown the assembly and council overwhelmed Berkeley to
make an accommodation. The Virginians recognized the authority of the
commonwealth of England, and promised to pass no statute contrary to the
laws of Parliament. On the other hand the commissioners acknowledged the
submission of Virginia "as a voluntary act not forced nor constrained by a
conquest upon the country." They conceded to the General Assembly the sole
right to lay taxes, and promised to secure to her the ancient limits
granted by the former royal charter. Bennett was made governor, and
Claiborne secretary of state, and Berkeley retired to Green Spring, near
Jamestown, where his home was the favorite resort of fugitive cavaliers.
The commissioners then proceeded to St.
Mary's, the capital of Maryland, where they met with even less resistance
than at Jamestown.
During the next six years the Virginians had
pretty much the control of their own affairs. Despite the navigation act
they renewed their trade with Holland and prospered accordingly, and in
1654 there were fifteen counties inhabited by about 22,000 people.
Benjamin Symes founded a free school in 1635 and Thomas Eaton one in 1659,
and the General Assembly required the churchwardens to see that all poor
children were taught to read and write.
In this time there was but one serious
setback. Maryland was, until 1657, practically ruled from Virginia by the
commissioners Bennett and Claiborne, who vigorously asserted against Lord
Baltimore the rights of Virginia to all territory claimed by him in
Maryland. But Lord Baltimore paid such court to Oliver Cromwell and made
to him such exaggerated statements of his devotion to the commonwealth
that the Virginia representatives, seeing that they could accomplish
nothing, hastened to make an accommodation. They recognized his Lordship's
authority in Maryland, and sought only in return to guarantee to the
Protestant inhabitants of Maryland their individual land titles and the
maintenance of the toleration act of 1649.
During the anarchy in England following the
resignation of Richard Cromwell from his office as Lord High Protector,
the Assembly of Virginia assumed the supreme power, and, on the death of
Gov. Samuel Matthews, recalled Sir William Berkeley to the government in
March, 1660. Two months later General Monk proclaimed Charles II. in
London, and his example was joyfully followed at Jamestown by Sir William
Berkeley, September 20.
Bacon's Rebellion.
Claiborne's struggle to preserve the integrity
of the domain of Virginia was at an end, and a new era identified with the
name of Nathaniel Bacon commenced. The rebellion which broke out sixteen
years after the restoration was mainly produced by the long continued
exercise of prerogative conflicting with the rights of the people. Thus
against the protest of the colonists the navigation act was reenacted by
Charles II. in 1663, and by its strict enforcement caused a great
depression in the sale of tobacco. Then titles to lands were rendered very
uncertain by extensive grants to Lord Culpeper and other court favorites,
and there was a heavy burden of taxation due to the extravagance of
officials in Virginia. The Assembly called in 1662, composed of the
friends of the governor, continued for fourteen years, and by it taxes
were imposed for towns that never flourished, and for public utilities
that exceeded the needs of the people and cost three times as much as they
were worth. To all these impositions on the people by government were
added other misfortunes-invasions in 1667 and 1673 by Dutch fleets, which
destroyed the shipping in the river, and the ravages of a great storm in
the former year which blew down 15,000 houses (principally tobacco barns)
in Virginia and Maryland. At length, in 1676, matters were brought to a
crisis by troubles with the Indians, who committed many murders on the
frontiers of the settlements, which stretched at that time to the falls of
the different rivers. The people begged Nathanial Bacon, Jr., of Curls, in
Henrico county, to protect them; and he, after petitioning Governor
Berkeley in "vain for a commission, went out against the Indians on his
own authority. He won a great victory over the Occaneechees on an island
in the Roanoke River, and on his return home was elected to the new
Assembly which convened at Jamestown June 5, 1676. Berkeley resented
Bacon's fighting without his authority and, when the latter came to the
Assembly, he had him arrested for high treason; but as Bacon's friends
were very numerous, Berkeley soon let him go and restored him to his seat
in the council.
The conciliation was not cordial, and after a
few days Bacon, fearing that his life was in danger, secretly left
Jamestown and hurried home to Henrico. Here his neighbors thronged around
him and begged him to lead them down to Jamestown. Bacon consented, and on
June 23 he was again at the island, this time with 500 men at his back.
Yielding to force, the governor gave him a commission and the legislature
passed some very wholesome laws, correcting many long-standing abuses, and
among them was one making the bounds of "James City" include the whole
island as far as Sandy Bay, and giving the people within those limits the
right for the first time of making their own local ordinances.
Bacon returned to Henrico and was on the eve
of going out for a second time against the Indians, when news arrived that
Berkeley was over in Gloucester county, endeavoring to raise forces to
surprise and capture him. This caused him to give up his expeditions and
to direct his march to Gloucester, where, having arrived, he found that
the governor had fled to Accomac. Bacon thus left supreme, summoned the
leading men of the colony to Middleton Plantation, and there on August 1
made them swear to stand by him even against soldiers sent from England,
saying "500 Virginians might beat 2,000 redcoats." After this his next
move was to lead his troops against the Pamunkeys, whom he discovered and
defeated in the recesses of the Dragon Swamp, somewhere in King and Queen
county. But his troubles did not end, and when he returned to the
settlement he found the governor once more established at Jamestown.
Bacon made straight for his antagonist, and
having arrived on September 13 in "Paspahegh Old Fields" across from the
island found that Berkeley had fortified the isthmus on the island side.
He caused his men to throw up some earthworks, and in an engagement on the
neck soon after killed some of Berkeley's soldiers, which so disheartened
the rest that they took ship and abandoned Jamestown. Bacon, thereupon,
entered the town and, supposing that Berkeley would soon return, gave
orders for its destruction, setting the example by applying a torch to the
church, while Lawrence and Drummond, his two most important supporters,
fired their own houses. In the general conflagration the state house and
church perished with the other buildings, but Drummond did a good deed in
saving the public records.
Berkeley, driven from Jamestown, made the
house of Col. John Custis in Northampton county his headquarters, while
Bacon, after pillaging Green Spring, marched to Gloucester and encamped at
Major Pate's house, near Poropotank Creek, where he was taken sick, and
died Oct. 26, 1676. The rebellion being without a real leader soon
collapsed. It continued, however, for a few months longer under Ingram and
Walklate, but they soon made haste to ensure their own safety by
surrendering West Point in January, 1677. Lawrence, who was at the "Brick
House" opposite, was informed of the treachery, fled to the forest and was
never heard of again, but Drummond was taken and presented to Berkeley at
King's Creek, Jan. 19, 1677, the day he first set foot on the western
shore after the flight from Jamestown in September previous.
Berkeley hanged Drummond and about forty other
of the insurgents, and would have hanged more had his hand not been stayed
by the royal commissioners sent over by the King to enquire into and
report upon the disturbances. They brought a summons from the King for his
return, and there was great rejoicing among the people when he finally
departed, May 5, 1677, for England, where he died soon after his arrival.
Sir Herbert Jefferys, one of the
commissioners, succeeded Berkeley as lieutenant-governor, but the spirit
of the late troubles dominated politics during his administration and for
several years later. The excesses of Berkeley and his adherents turned the
sympathies of Jefferys and the other commissioners
against them, and for the next twelve years "the Green Spring" faction, as
the friends of Berkeley were called, were found in opposition to the
government.
Despite the suppression of the rebellion the
work of Bacon was not in vain; for, as a consequence of his stout
measures, the colonists got rid of Berkeley and the rule of the
aristocracy, and obtained through the commissioners an opportunity to
state their grievances, and many of the abuses were remedied by the
express command of the King. Thus Lord Culpeper surrendered his more
extensive grant of the whole of Virginia and retained only his title to
the Northern Neck, and no similar grants were ever again made by the Kings
of England. Moreover, the punishment inflicted by Bacon upon the Indians
removed any trouble from that source for many years. Finally, as we have
seen, the political tables were reversed and the friends of Berkeley
learned to have more sympathy with the rights of man. Under the form of
the government Robert Beverley and Philip Ludwell, who had upheld Berkeley
in his contest with Bacon, became the representative of the dearest rights
of the people which they had at one time despised. As a punishment for
their resistance to the attempts of governors Jefferys, Culpeper and
Howard to tamper with the journals of the house, to suppress the writ of
habeas corpus, to assume the right to lay taxes, and to exercise the right
of a double negative on the acts of the Assembly, Beverley and Ludwell
were deprived of their respective offices as clerk of the House of
Burgesses and member of the council. These jealousies inherited from
Bacon's rebellion entered into the restlessness of the people in 1682,
when the low price of tobacco seemed to portend another rebellion.
The people clamored for a law to limit the
amount of tobacco to be raised, and when the General Assembly adjourned
without taking any action the people in the counties of Gloucester and
Middlesex ran from one plantation to another and cut down the growing
plants. The governor sent a military force against them, and the
disturbances were speedily suppressed. Several of the ringleaders were
hanged, and Beverley was much persecuted because of his professed
sympathies with the plantcutters.
Other commotions ensued when the governor and
his council delayed to recognize the revolution in England, in the winter
of 1688-1689. Roman Catholics were believed to be concerting with the
Indians to murder the Protestants. There was great excitement in the
Northern Neck, where the people were boldly harangued by a preacher named
John Waugh. Finally in April, 1689, fears were quieted by orders received
from England to proclaim the new sovereigns, and "with unfeigned joy and
exultation" William and Mary were declared sovereigns of England and her
dominions.
The English Revolution Ushers in a New Era.
The accession of the new sovereigns was the
beginning, politically, educationally, religiously and territorially, of a
new era in Virginia. The population had reached 85,000, and an immense
increase of negro slaves placed white people above dependence on tobacco
and rendered them prosperous. From this period also dates the complete
ascendency in colonial affairs of the popular House of Burgesses, though
after all but two of the attacks made by the Stuart Kings upon public and
private rights had the character of permanency. These exceptions were the
navigation law and the suffrage restrictions, though in the latter case
the political rights of the people were not so greatly affected as one
might suppose.
Down to 1670 everyone above the condition of a
servant had the right of suffrage for members of the House of Burgesses.
In that year the suffrage was limited by Berkeley's long parliament to
householders and freeholders. This law was repealed by Bacon, but
reestablished under orders from the King by the Assembly which met after
Bacon's rebellion. And yet the limitation was more in words than in
reality, for as the law did not define the freehold manhood suffrage
remained practically the constitution of Virginia till 1736, when the
first real restriction on the suffrage was made. Nevertheless, even after
that time the proportion of voters in Virginia was greater than in
Massachusetts.
Educationally also, the colony took a new turn
for the better. Free schools were established in most of the counties, and
in 1693 a college was erected at Middle Plantation which took the names of
the reigning monarchs-William and Mary. This institution served the
purpose of educating most of the leading characters of Virginia during the
War of the Revolution. The transfer of the capital to Williamsburg, in
1699, emphasized the onward march of events.
In a religious significance there was also a
great, change during this era. Hitherto the uniformity of worship
according to the rules of the English church had been very little
disturbed, but the end of the period witnessed more than half of the
people of Virginia turned dissenters.
Greatly affecting all the tendencies of
Virginia life was the train of events which marked the long contest
between England and France for dominion on the continent. The effect of
this quarrel was to bring the different colonies into closer affiliation
with one another and to prepare the way for the American Revolution.
Though the government of Virginia after 1697 was directed by a line of
lieutenant-governors, while the chief office was a sinecure for somebody
in England, it was vigorously managed, and there were fewer abler
executives anywhere than Francis Nicholson, Alexander Spotswood, William
Gooch and Robert Dinwiddie. They were singularly active in asserting the
English title to America and resisting the French and Indians. Nicholson,
who was lieutenant-governor from 1690-92 and from 1697-1705, followed up
and carried yet further a suggestion made by Lord Culpeper for a
confederation of the colonies, under the supremacy of the loyal colony of
Virginia. He was a warm friend of the college, promoted the building of a
capitol at Williamsburg, at the close of the century had a census made of
the inhabitants, schools, churches and property in the colony, and
reported the urgent need of reform in the militia and military defenses.
His hot, peppery temper, however, got him into trouble with Dr. James
Blair, president of the college, and the members of his council, and in
1705 he was recalled to England.
Western Movement and Settlements.
Two important events were connected with the
administration of Edward Nott, his successor-the burning of the college in
October, 1705, and the passage of an act shortly after for the erection of
a governor's house or palace. In 1710 Alexander Spotswood, one of the most
active men of the age, became governor. He bestowed much attention upon
the improvement of Williamsburg and assisted in building a new brick
church in Williamsburg and in restoring the college. He purged the coast
of pirates, built an armory in Williamsburg, encouraged innocent social
gatherings and promoted the iron industry, but his largeness of view was
more especially seen in his plan of preventing the French design of
connecting Canada with Louisiana by wedging the frontiers of the colony in
between these northern and southern possessions of France.
He got the legislature to lay out two new
counties -Brunswick and Spotsylvania-to act as buffers against invasion,
and established a fort respectively in each, Christanna and Germanna. In
1716 he led from Williamsburg to the valley of the Shenandoah an
expedition which blended romance with politics. He claimed the country for
King George, and upon his return to Williamsburg he presented every one of
his company with a golden horseshoe bearing the inscription Sic Juvat
Transcendere montes.
Spotswood's opinion of the significance of his
exploration is exhibited in a letter to the Board of Trade. In recent
years, he says, the French have built fortresses in such positions "that
the British plantations are in a manner Surrounded by their Commerce w'th
the numerous Nations of Indians seated on both sides of the Lakes; they
may not only Engross the whole Skin Trade, but may, when they please, Send
out such Bodys of Indians on the back of these Plantations as may greatly
distress his Maj'ty's Subjects here, And should they multiply their
settlem'nts along these Lakes, so as to joyn their Dominions of Canada to
their new Colony of Louisiana, they might even possess themselves of any
of these Plantations they pleased. Nature, 'tis true, has formed a Barrier
for us by that long Chain of Mountains w'ch run from back of South
Carolina as far as New York, and w'ch are only passable in some few
places, but even that Natural Defence may prove rather destructive to us,
if they are not possessed by us before they are known to them: To prevent
the dangers w'ch Threaten his Maj'ty's Dominions here from the growing
power of these Neighbours, nothing seems to me of more consequence than
that now while the Nations are at peace, and while the French are yet
uncapable of possessing all that vast Tract w'ch lies on the back of these
Plantations, we should attempt to make some Settlements on ye Lakes, and
at the same time possess our selves of those passes of the great
Mountains, w'ch are necessary to preserve a Communication w'th such
Settlements."
Unfortunately Spotswood's haughty carriage and
impatience of contradiction involved him, as Nicholson had been, in
quarrels with the council and Dr. Blair, president of the college, and he
was removed in 1722.
However, Spotswood's visit to the valley of
Virginia was soon to bear valuable fruit. During the administration of Sir
William Gooch the immigration to Virginia was so great that population
doubled, being, in 1749, upwards of 292,000. In the eastern section there
was a large addition of negroes, which aroused serious fears and called
forth repeated legislative acts to restrict the importation, which were
always vetoed by the home government. But the greatest changes ensued in
the western portion of the colony. Starting with the year 1726 the great
valley between the Blue Ridge and the Alleghany Mountains began to fill up
with large numbers of German and Scotch-Irish settlers, who soon carried
the English frontier against the French line of advance.
This made the contest more realistic to
Virginians, for hitherto the scene of actual hostilities was along the
Canadian border, and the colonies to the south of New York were not
directly involved.
Intercolonial Affairs and Indian Wars.
In 1739 England declared war against Spain, of
whom France was secretly an ally, and in 1740 Virginia cooperated with the
other colonies and the mother country in sending an expedition against
Carthagena-a city of Central America. The Virginia troops were under the
command of the late governor, Alexander Spotswood, who died at Annapolis
just as they were ready to embark, and thereupon Governor Gooch assumed
command of the colonial contingent. In the attack upon Carthagena Gooch
was severely wounded, and the expedition proved a fail-Lire. Four years
later England declared war against France, and the General Assembly
appropriated £4,000 to the raising of Virginia's quota of troops for an
invasion of Canada by a joint British and colonial army. They sailed from
Hampton in June, but the British auxiliaries failed to appear and the
Virginians returned home not long after. Governor Gooch was again offered
the command of the colonial soldiers but declined. Nevertheless, in
recognition of his services at Carthagena, he was made a major-general the
next year. At length in 1749, after a long and popular administration, he
returned with his wife-Lady Rebecca Stanton Gooch-to England, where he
died, Dec. 17, 1751.
In the meantime the settlement of the valley
had been accomplished, and many enterprising spirits were looking to the
country beyond the Alleghanies. In 1748 some of the valley settlers
crossing the Alleghanies made a settlement at Draper's Meadows upon
Greenbrier River. The next year 500,000 acres of land, lying west of the
Alleghanies and south of the Ohio River, were granted to a company of
planters and merchants called the Ohio Company for the purpose of
settlement. Christopher Gist, as agent for the Company, was promptly
dispatched to explore the country, and he visited what are now the states
of West Virginia, Kentucky and Ohio. While he was absent on this business
the Company constructed a trading house at Wills' Creek, now Cumberland,
Maryland, near the head of the Poto. mac, and in 1752 they built another
stockade on the Monongahela.
And neither were the French idle during this
time. In 1749 they sent an expedition to the Ohio River under Celeron de
Bienville, who was charged with the double purpose of taking possession by
planting leaden plates graven with the French claim, and of driving out
the English traders who were found already swarming into the country.
In the spring of 1753 the French erected a log
stockade called Fort Le Boeuf, upon French Creek, a northern tributary of
the Alleghany River, and soon after another outpost was established by
them at the Forks of the Ohio, 120 miles to the south. The English trading
post at Venango, at the junction of French Creek and the Alleghany, was
seized and occupied by a small detachment from Le Boeuf.
It was fortunate that at this juncture the
government of Virginia was in the hands of such an active man as
Lieut.-Gov. Robert Dinwiddie. He was a Scotchman and came over in 1751. He
was an able man, a hard worker, and by his alertness in detecting a fraud
in the collection of the customs was appointed "surveyor-general of the
customs of the southern part of the continent of America," and afterwards
chief magistrate of the colony of Virginia.
Dinwiddie resented the intrusion of the
French, and in October, 1753, sent Maj. George Washington,
adjutant-general of the colonial militia, guided by Mr. Gist, to
remonstrate with them against occupy ing a district "so notoriously known
to be the property of the crown of Great Britain." Washington, then only
21 years of age, was already a man of mark. After a dreary and hazardous
voyage Washington and his small party of attendants arrived late in
November, first at Venango and then at Le Boeuf. The French commandant
read Dinwiddie's letter, but returned word that he would hold his ground
till ordered off by his superior, Marquis Duquesne, the governor of
Canada. Washington thereupon set out for Williamsburg, where he arrived
Jan. 15, 1754, after an absence of eleven weeks and a journey of 1,500
miles.
Upon receiving Washington's report, Governor
Dinwiddie authorized William Trent, of Lexington, to march with a small
company to build a log fort at the Forks of the Ohio. Another company was
to rendezvous at Alexandria and proceed to the same point, and Washington
was to take command of both as major. In February the Assembly voted
£10,000 to support the governor's purposes, and he was thereby enabled to
increase his force to a regiment of 300, making Joshua Fry colonel and
George Washington lieutenant-colonel. On April 2, 1754, Washington began
his march from Alexandria with about fifty men to help Captain Trent, but
on the 20th news reached him that the fort was taken by a force of French
and Indians of more than twenty times the number of the garrison. Trent's
command of thirtythree men joined Washington at Wills' Creek, and the
latter, undaunted by the report of superior force before him, marched with
about 300 men through the mountain passes to within a short distance of
the Forks of the river, where the French had converted Trent's little work
into a stronghold which they called Fort Duquesne. Here Washington, at the
head of a scouting party, came in contact with a scouting party of French
commanded by the Count de Jumonville. The Virginia commander promptly
attacked and defeated the French with the loss of their commander and
about twenty men. This was, the first regular battle of the war, and
greatly in censed the French at Fort Duquesne who, on receipt of the news,
sent a large force to attack the Virginians. Washington, after proceeding
as far as Gist', plantation, thought it prudent to retreat, and at the
Great Meadows erected a stockade which he called Fort Necessity. Here on
July 3, sorely distressed for provisions and ammunition, he was closely be
sieged by the enemy possessed of double his numbers. Finding that he could
not hold out successfully Washington listened to terms of accommodation
The fort was surrendered and he was allowed to march his troops back to
their homes. The French had now complete possession of the west, but the
behavior of the Virginia troops met with the warn applause of their
countrymen, and Washington was more highly thought of than ever.
Dinwiddie, more than any of the colonial
authorities, realized the gravity of the situation and was not idle under
defeat. He persistently appealed for assistance to the home authorities,
who at last were moved to the importance of regaining the country back
from France.
The war proved at first very disastrous,
however under the weak administration of the Duke of New Castle in
England. In 1755 Gen. Edward Braddock sent with a strong force of British
regulars to capture Fort Duquesne, was caught in an ambush and slain with
many of his men. Indeed, Washington and his Virginians alone saved the
army from complete destruction. In the North the French under General
Montcalm captured Oswego and Fort William Henry, and the torch of their
Indian allies enveloped the frontiers with fire. For four years the evil
days followed one another, and amid all these disheartening scenes
Washington and his 1,500 Virginia, riflemen presented the only bright and
redeeming picture. Theirs was the task of protecting 350 miles of frontier
and they performed their duty well. The arduous work of supporting and
directing these troops fell to Gov. Robert Dinwiddie, and that on the
whole he met the varied and onerous duties of his trust with ability is
attested by the repeated commendations which he received from the English
ministry, and the General Assembly and people of Virginia. In 1758 he was
relieved from the post of governor of Virginia at his own request, and
sailed for England in January. After his departure Hon. John Blair, as
president of the council, was acting governor till relieved by Francis
Fauquier, who arrived as lieutenant-governor on June 17, 1758.
Shortly after Fauquier's coming the war with
France, under the guidance of the great William Pitt at the head of
affairs in England, took a course of uninterrupted British success. In
July, 1758, Wolfe captured Louisburg, the famous stronghold of the French
on Cape Breton Island; in August Fort Frontenac fell before Bradstreet,
and in November Gen. John Forbes, assisted by Washington, captured Fort
Duquesne. The next year Quebec, the very centre and heart of the French
power in America, fell before the assault of the intrepid Wolfe. The fall
of Quebec was sealed with the death of the great general, Montcalm, who
had been the soul of the French resistance. The next year Montreal
surrendered, and as a result a peace was made, by the terms of which all
the possessions of France on this continent passed into the hands of
England. Then France, by defeats in other quarters of the globe, also lost
extensive holding in Asia and the West Indies. Great Britain never
appeared half so imperial as at the conclusion of this war, but out of
this triumph were to grow domestic difficulties which avenged France for
her misfortunes and ultimated in the independence of her American
colonies.
Social Conditions, 1760.
The period of Fauquier's administration has
been called the golden age of colonial Virginia. The people in the old
settled portions were in possession of many of the comforts that dignified
the life of the higher classes in England. In contrast to the log cabin of
the early settlers the majority of the homes were comfortable wooden
structures of a story and a half, while the wealthy planters lived in
large square brick houses with handsome paneling and superior furniture.
As to the means of getting about, the country was interlaced with roads
which were good nine months of the year and very bad the other three. In
the earliest days the only means of travel was by horse; carts were
introduced about 1618. At the close of the Seventeenth century carriages
were in use, and at the time of which we speak the chariots of Virginia
were as costly as the best in England. It was generally conceded that the
horses of Virginia were the finest in America.
In table diet the mode of living was
distinctively higher than in the northern colonies. There was a great
display of plate and variety of eatables, and the gentry had their
"victuals dressed and served up as nicely as if they were in London." As
to learning, the county court and vestries saw to the education of the
poor, and the sons of the well-to-do had the benefit of private teachers,
public schools, the College of William and Mary and the European colleges.
Jefferson wrote to Joseph C. Cabell, in 1820, that "the mass of education
in Virginia before the Revolution placed her among the foremost of her
sister states." Domestic commerce was extensive, and the rivers and the
creeks swarmed with small craft, all of which were made in Virginia; as
early as 1690 ships of 300 tons were built, and afterwards trade to the
West Indies was conducted in ships of Virginia make.
BIBLIOGRAPHY. - Andrews: Colonial Self
Government; Beverley, Robert: History of Virginia (1722); Bruce: Social
and Economic History of Virginia; Burke, John D.: History of Virginia;
Campbell, Charles: History of the Colony and Ancient Dominion of Virginia;
Doyle, J. A.: British Colonies in America; Letters of Alexander Spotswood
(2 vols.); Letters of Robert Dinwiddie (2 vols.); Fiske, John: Old
Virginia and Her Neighbors, Calendar o f State Papers; Force: Tracts;
Greene: Provincial America (Vol. VI. of Hart's American Nation); Hening:
Statutes at Large; Howison, R. R.: History of Virginia; Hartwell, Blair
and Chilton: An Account of the Present State of Virginia; Jones, Hugh:
Present State of Virginia; Neill: The Virginia Company (1868), Virginia
Carolorum (1886), Virginia Vetusta (1885), Virginia and Virginiola (1878);
Stith, William: History of Virginia (1747); Thwaites: France in America
(Vol. VII. of Hart's American Nation); Tyler: England in America (Vol.
III. of Hart's American Nation), Cradle of the Republic, Jamestown and
James River; Virginia Historical Magazine (15 vols.); William and Mary
College Quarterly Historical Magazine (16 vols.); Virginia Historical
Register.
LYON GARDINER TYLER.,
President William and Mary College; editor Narratives of Early Virginia;
author The Cradle of the Republic, Williamsburg, The Old Colonial Capital,
etc. |