FORDYCE, GEORGE, a distinguished physician and lecturer
on medicine, was born at Aberdeen, November. 18, 1736, and was the only and
posthumous child of Mr George Fordyce, a brother of the other three
distinguished persons of the same name recorded in the present work, and the
proprietor of a small landed estate, called Broadford, in the neighbourhood
of that city. His mother, not long after, marrying again, he was taken from
her, when about two years old, and sent to Foveran, at which place he
received his school education. He was removed thence to the university of
Aberdeen, where he was made M. A., when only fourteen years of age.
In his childhood he had taken great delight in looking at
vials of coloured liquids, which were placed at the windows of an
apothecary’s shop. To this circumstance, and to his acquaintance with the
learned Alexander Garden, M. D., many years a physician in South Carolina,
and latterly in London, but then apprentice to a surgeon and apothecary in
Aberdeen, he used to attribute the resolution he very early formed to study
medicine. He was in consequence sent, when about fifteen years old, to his
uncle, Dr John Fordyce, who, at that time, practised medicine at Uppingham,
in Northamptonshire. With him, he remained several years, and then went to
the university of Edinburgh, where, after a residence of about three years,
he received the degree of M.D. in October, 1758. His inaugural dissertation
was upon catarrh.
While at Edinburgh, Dr Cullen was so much pleased with
his diligence and ingenuity, that, besides showing him many other marks of
regard, he used frequently to give him private assistance in his studies.
The pupil was ever after grateful for this kindness, and was accustomed to
speak of his preceptor in terms of the highest respect, calling him often
"his learned and revered master." About the end of 1758, he came to London,
but went shortly after to Leyden, for the purpose, chiefly of studying
anatomy under Albinus. He returned, in 1759, to London, where he soon
determined to fix himself as a teacher and practitioner of medicine. When he
made known this intention to his relations, they highly disapproved of it,
as the whole of his patrimony had been expended upon his education.
Inspired, however, with that confidence which frequently attends the
conscious possession of great talents, he persisted in his purpose, and,
before the end of 1759, commenced a course of lectures upon chemistry. This
was attended by nine pupils. In 1764, he began to lecture also upon Materia
Medica and the practice of physic. These three subjects he continued to
teach nearly thirty years, giving, for the most part, three courses of
lectures on each of them every year. A course lasted nearly four months;
and, during it, a lecture of nearly an hour was delivered six times in the
week. His time of teaching commenced about seven o’clock in the morning, and
ended at ten; his lecture upon the three above mentioned subjects being
given, one immediately after the other.
In 1765 he was admitted a licentiate of the College of
Physicians. In 1770 he was chosen physician to St Thomas’s hospital, after a
considerable contest with Sir William (then Dr) Watson; the number of votes
in his favour being 109, in that of Dr Watson 106. In 1774 he became a
member of the Literary Club; and in 1776 was elected a fellow of the Royal
Society. In 1787 he was admitted a fellow of the College of Physicians. No
circumstance can demonstrate more strongly the high opinion entertained of
his abilities by the rest of the profession in London, than his reception
into that body. He had been particularly active in the dispute, which had
existed about twenty years before, between the fellows and licentiates, and
had, for this reason, it was thought, forfeited all title to be admitted
into the fellowship through favour. But the college in 1787, were preparing
a new edition of their Pharmacopoeia; and there was confessedly no
one of their own number well acquainted with pharmaceutical chemistry. They
wisely, therefore, suppressed their resentment of his former conduct, and,
by admitting him into their body, secured his assistance in a work which
they were unable to perform well themselves.
In 1793 be assisted in forming a small society of
physicians and surgeons, which afterwards published several volumes, under
the title of "Medical and Chirurgical Transactions;" and continued to attend
its meetings most punctually till within a month or two of his death. Having
thus mentioned some of the principal events of his literary life, we shall
next give a list of his various medical and philosophical works; and first,
of those which were published by himself.
1. Elements of Agriculture and Vegetation. He had given a
course of lectures on these subjects to some young men of rank; soon after
the close of which, one of his hearers, the late Mr Stuart Mackenzie,
presented him with a copy of them, from notes he had taken while they were
delivered. Dr Fordyce corrected the copy, and afterwards published it under
the above mentioned title. 2. Elements of the practice of Physic. This was
used by him as a text-book for a part of his course of lectures on that
subject. 3. A Treatise on the Digestion of Food. It was originally read
before the College of Physicians, as the Guelstonian Lecture. 4. Four
Dissertations on Fever. A fifth, which completes the subject, was left by
him in manuscript, and afterwards published. His other works appeared in the
Philosophical Transactions, and the Medical and Chirurgical Transactions. In
the former are eight papers by him, with the following titles: 1. Of the
Light produced by Inflammation. 2. Examination of various Ores in the Museum
of Dr W. Hunter. 3. A New Method of assaying Copper Ores. 4. An Account of
some Experiments on the Loss of Weight in Bodies on being melted or heated.
5. An Account of an Experiment on Heat. 6. The Cronian Lecture on Muscular
Motion. 7. On the Cause of the additional Weight which Metals acquire on
being calcined. 8. Account of a New Pendulum, being the Bakerian
Lecture.—His papers in the Medical and Chirurgical Transactions are: 1.
Observations on the Small-pox, and Causes of Fever. 2. An Attempt to improve
the Evidence of Medicine. 3. Some Observations upon the composition of
Medicines. He was, besides, the inventor of the experiments in heated rooms,
an account of which was given to the Royal Society by Sir Charles Bladgen;
and was the author of many improvements in various arts connected with
chemistry, on which he used frequently to be consulted by manufacturers.
Though he had projected various literary works in
addition to those which have been mentioned, nothing was left by him in
manuscript, except the Dissertation on Fever already spoken of, and two
introductory lectures, one to his Course of Materia Medica, the other to
that of the Practice of Physic. This will not appear extraordinary to those
who knew what confidence he had in the accuracy of his memory. He gave all
his lectures without notes, and perhaps never possessed any; he took no
memorandum in writing of the engagements he formed, whether of business or
pleasure, and was always most punctual in observing them; and when he
composed his works for the public, even such as describe successions of
events, found together, as far as we can perceive, by no necessary tie, his
materials, such at least as were his own, were altogether drawn from stores
in his memory, which had often been laid up there many years before. In
consequence of this retentiveness of memory, and of great reading and a most
inventive mind, he was, perhaps, more generally skilled in the sciences,
which are either directly subservient to medicine, or remotely connected
with it, than any other person of his time.
One fault in his character as an author, probably arose,
either wholly or in part, from the very excellence which has been mentioned.
This was his deficiency in the art of literary composition; the knowledge of
which he might have insensibly acquired, to a much greater degree than was
possessed by him, had he felt the necessity in his youth of frequently
committing his thoughts to writing, for the purpose of preserving them. But,
whether this be just or not, it must be confessed, that, notwithstanding his
great learning, which embraced many subjects no way allied to medicine, he
seldom wrote elegantly, often obscurely and inaccurately; and that he
frequently erred with respect even to orthography. His language, however, in
conversation, which confirms the preceding conjecture, was not less correct
than that of most other persons of good education. As a lecturer, his
delivery was slow and hesitating, and frequently interrupted by pauses not
required by his subject. Sometimes, indeed, these continued so long, that
persons unaccustomed to his manner, were apt to fear that he was
embarrassed. But these disadvantages did not prevent his having a
considerable number of pupils, actuated by the expectation of receiving from
him more time and accurate instruction than they could elsewhere obtain.
His person is said to have been handsome in his youth;
but his countenance, from its fullness, must have been always inexpressive
of the great powers of his mind. His manners too were less refined, and his
dress in general less studied, than what most persons in this country regard
as proper for a physician. From these causes, and from his spending no more
time with his patients than what was sufficient for his forming a just
opinion of their ailments, he had for many years but little private
employment in his profession; and never, even in the latter part of his
life, when his reputation was at its height, enjoyed nearly so much as many
of his contemporaries. It is worthy of mention, however, that the amount of
his fees, during the year immediately preceding his decease, was greater,
notwithstanding his advanced age and infirm health, than it had ever been
before in the same space of time.
He had always been fond of the pleasures of society; and
in his youth, to render the enjoyment of them compatible with his pursuits
after knowledge, he used to sleep very little. He has often, indeed, been
known to lecture for three hours in a morning without having undressed
himself the preceding night. The vigour of his constitution enabled him to
sustain, for a considerable time, without apparent injury, this debilitating
mode of life. But at length he was attacked with gout, which afterwards
became irregular, and for many years frequently affected him with
excruciating pains in his stomach and bowels. In the latter part of his life
also, his feet and ancles were almost constantly swollen; and, shortly
before his death, he had symptoms of water in the chest. But these he
disregarded, and uniformly attributed his situation, which for several weeks
previous to his death he knew to be hopeless, to the presence of the
first-mentioned disease. Death ultimately relieved him from his sufferings,
May 25, 1802, when he was in the 64th year of his age. By his wife, who was
the daughter of Charles Stuart, Esq., conservator of Scots privileges in the
United Netherlands, and whom he had married in 1762, he left four children,
two sons and two daughters.