Edited by Frank R. Shaw, FSA Scot, Greater Atlanta, GA, USA
Email: jurascot@earthlink.net
It’s always a
pleasure to welcome Dr. Patrick Scott back to the pages of Robert
Burns Lives!. His writings continue to be enlightening and add
much to our study of Scotland’s famous Bard. Today Dr. Scott
introduces us to a Burns contemporary, poet and ornithologist,
Alexander Wilson. As I write these words, Patrick is in Scotland
doing further research and visiting with dear friends at the
University of Glasgow. I imagine from somewhere along the way during
his travels there will appear another article for our website. My
compliments and continued thanks to Patrick for enriching the
content of Robert Burns Lives! from its inception. For
our new readers, please see our index page for Chapter 135, “A
Tribute to Dr. Patrick Scott, A Noted Robert Burns Scholar”, which
is the talk I gave when he retired from the University of South
Carolina few years ago. (FRS: 4.13.16)
A Scottish
Contemporary of Burns: Alexander Wilson (1766-1813),
Poet and Ornithologist
By
Patrick Scott
One of the great
unanswerable questions about Robert Burns is “What if he had
emigrated”? How would he have supported his family? Would he have
found some new career? Would he have continued writing? How would
his perspective on Scotland have changed if he had been writing from
overseas? He thought of emigrating, in the mid-1780s, but at that
time, in the immediate aftermath of the American war of
independence, he had arranged to go to Jamaica, not to the United
States. But in the 1790s, as his family responsibilities grew, and
the constraints of Scottish politics tightened on him, what if Burns
had broken free and set off to establish a new life in the new
United States, about which he wrote so admiringly?
Alexander Wilson,
born Paisley, 1766; died Philadelphia, 1813
Engraving from portrait attributed to Thomas Sully
Many contemporary
Scots did emigrate, both for economic and political reasons. Among
them were at least two young Scots poets of Burns’s own generation:
Alexander Wilson from Paisley, who went to the States in 1794 and
lived chiefly in Pennsylvania, and Gavin Turnbull from Kilmarnock
and Dumfries, who settled in South Carolina the following year (see
Robert Burns Lives! 159, and other references below). Both
Wilson and Turnbull had published books of poetry in Scotland before
they left, and though both continued writing after they emigrated,
neither published any more poetry in book form. Both became better
known for other accomplishments, Turnbull making a modest reputation
as an actor, and Wilson becoming one of the greatest American
ornithologists, before his achievement was overshadowed by John
James Audubon.
Wilson’s
extraordinary later achievement has often deflected attention from
the significance of his pre-emigration life and writings. One
specific effect has been to deflect attention also from the
relevance of Wilson’s experiences to the choices that Burns was
making in the same period. Wilson’s writings and struggles in
Scotland provide a kind of mirror image to Burns’s experiences in
the same years. And towards the end of his life, he wrote a
fascinating poem, recalling Burns’s appearance and the effect of
meeting him many years before.
I
was surprised to find how little reference to Wilson there is in
books about Burns (no entry in Lindsay’s Burns Encyclopaedia
for instance, no index reference in Mackay’s biography), though
there is good evidence that Burns knew Wilson’s poetry, and at least
some indication that the two met. A very interesting recent book,
Alexander Wilson, The Scot Who Founded American Ornithology,
by two American scholars, Edward H. ‘Jed’ Burtt, Jr., and William E.
Davis, Jr. (Harvard University Press, 2013), provides a useful
introduction to Wilson’s life as well as a more detailed study of
his later achievement. As reviewers pointed out, the book’s
emphasis is on Wilson as ornithologist, not poet (see e.g. Altenberg,
in Wall Street Journal; Paxton, in New York Review of
Books). Well produced and very modestly priced, the book is
also copiously illustrated, mostly from Wilson’s original drawings
of American
birds rather than from his published engravings.
The authors’ initial
spur to writing the book was the discovery of new Wilson drawings,
and their focus is very much on Wilson’s scientific and artistic
accomplishments in America rather than on his writing in Scotland.
Their account suggests it may be
time for Scottish researchers, and particularly Burnsians,
to look further at Wilson’s early life and literary achievement.
This short essay is not the full study or critical assessment that
is needed, but I hope it may whet interest for forthcoming research
on Wilson, including a forthcoming essay by Gerard Carruthers on
Wilson as laboring-class writer (Carruthers 2016) and a volume of
essays on all aspects of his achievement planned by Professor Burtt
and currently in preparation.
I first encountered
Wilson several years ago because, alongside the Roy Collection,
which has copies of Wilson’s poems, the University of South Carolina
library also has a great collection of natural history (Scott,
2001). The library bought Wilson’s scientific works in the first
decades of the nineteenth century, volume by volume as they were
being published. The series that made Wilson famous was his
American Ornithology; or, the Natural History of the Birds of the
United States, illustrated with plates (9 vols., Philadelphia,
1808-1814), and after Wilson’s death the illustrations were
handsomely republished without the text (Philadelphia, 1829). A few
years later, the college would also be among the first American
subscribers to John James Audubon’s rival series, Birds of
America (1827-1838). Both Wilson and Audubon utilized the same
basic technique for their illustrations (hand-colored copperplate
engravings), but Wilson either did the engraving himself or worked
closely with a fellow emigrant Scot Alexander Lawson, a leading
Philadelphia engraver, while Audubon’s work were engraved for him in
Britain, a few by John Lizars in Edinburgh, but most by Robert
Havell in London. Both Wilson and Audubon traveled widely in search
of new bird species, and Wilson also had the benefit of being able
to use specimens recently brought back from the west by Meriwether
Lewis, who after his return had settled in Philadelphia to write an
official account of the Lewis and Clark Expedition of 1804-1806.
Audubon generally depicted only one life-sized species in each
engraved plate, but Wilson grouped several birds together on each,
so that, even though he is (I am told) more accurate than Audubon on
specific details, Wilson’s engravings have not been as sought after
by collectors as the Havell Audubons and do not command the same
astounding prices at auction.
Alexander Wilson,
“Orchard Oriole,” from American Ornithology, vol. 1 (1808),
pl. 4.From
the South Carolina College Library: Irvin Dept. of Rare Books &
Special Collections, University of South Carolina Libraries
Wilson’s reputation
as an ornithologist means that, unlike Gavin Turnbull, there has
never been a time when his life or achievement has been wholly
neglected. Soon after his death, his American friend George Ord
produced the first short biography, and only a few years later an
older Scottish friend, Thomas Crichton, contributed a memoir to a
local Paisley magazine. In 1816, Wilson’s soberly-titled first
volume Poems (Paisley, 1790) was recycled by a London
publisher with a new title Poems, Chiefly in the Scottish Dialect
to bring out the Burns connection. In 1832, the Scottish
scientist William Jardine wrote a prefatory life of Wilson for a
British reprint of Wilson’s American Ornithology, and in 1840
Wilson was given his own chapter in James Paterson’s book, The
Contemporaries of Burns. In the 1870s, a Presbyterian minister,
the indefatigable Dr. Alexander Grosart, edited a two-volume
collection of Wilson’s writings for a Paisley publisher. In 1906, a
descendant, James Southall Wilson, put into print Wilson’s
correspondence with President Thomas Jefferson. More recently,
there have been two substantial modern biographies of Wilson, by R.
G. Cantwell in 1961 and by Clark Hunter in 1983. Both Cantwell and
Hunter provide fuller detail about Wilson’s Scottish life than is
given in the new biography, but the new book is much to be welcomed,
not only because of its significant new material on Wilson’s later
accomplishments, but because none of these earlier sources is now
easily available outside major libraries.
The story of Wilson’s
life is both exciting and moving. He was born in Paisley in 1766,
son of a weaver who also ran a sideline in smuggler and illegal
distilling. Wilson’s parents had at first hoped he would become a
minister, and his later autobiographical poem “The Solitary Tutor”
recounts both his rejection of orthodox religion and recalls his
early education, which, like Burns’s, introduced him to classic
English poets such as Milton. After his mother died in 1776 and his
father remarried, Wilson, then aged ten, was removed from school
and, after working first on a farm, served a three-year
apprenticeship to his brother-in-law, also a weaver. His first
recorded poem, celebrating completion of his indentures, aged
sixteen, is in Scots:
Be’t kent to a’ the
warld in rhime
That wi’ right mickle wark and toil
For three lang years I’ve sert my time … [sert:
served]
(Grosart I: xxii)
Wilson went on to
work as a journeyman-weaver for the brother-in-law, and after a time
started to alternate periods of weaving, either in Paisley or in his
brother-in-law’s shop, now near Edinburgh, with periods traveling
through west and central Scotland as a chapman. Chapmen or peddlars
walked the countryside from farmstead to farmstead with a backpack
of small items such as needles, ribbons, buttons, and of course
chapbooks, the little pamphlets in which country people read popular
traditional stories, history, poems and songs (on chapmen, see e.g.
Cowan; Cowan and Paterson).
Both occupations were
solitary, even lonely, leaving Wilson master of his own time and
thoughts, and over the next few years he produced a significant body
of poetry. As with Gavin Turnbull’s poetry, some of Wilson’s early
poems, such as his “Morning” or “Evening an Ode,” were accomplished
exercises in eighteenth-century neoclassical pastoral. Some early
poems, though, are more lively, colloquial, even scurrilous, satire
on local characters, notably Wilson’s “Elegy on the long expected
dearth of an old miser,” a scornful account of the elderly James
Craig who had married the Wilsons’ minx of a maidservant (with whom
Wilson himself had had a brief teenage affair). Wilson already had a
local reputation as a poet before the success of Burns’s Kilmarnock
edition in 1786, and it is not clear when he first read Burns, but
the subscriber’s list for the Edinburgh edition of 1787 includes
Alexander Wilson of Paisley as having ordered two copies. The
Currie Inventory records that in November 1789 Wilson wrote a letter
to Burns, but the inventory records very little about what Wilson
wrote: “A youth—A stranger----Expresses in …” (Ewing, p. 13, entry
132 (1); cf. Scott and DuRant, Robert Burns Lives!, no.
207). It is also reported that Wilson once went over “to Ayr”
(presumably to Mauchline), to try to visit Burns, but found he was
away (Jardine, p. xxvi).
In due course, in
1790, Wilson decided to follow Burns’s example, publish a book of
his own poetry, and try his fate in guid black prent. For initial
sales of the book, Wilson followed the subscription method that
Burns had used four years earlier for his Kilmarnock poems, but he
lacked Burns’s strong support with a network of local patrons
soliciting groups of individual subscribers. His very positive poem
in the volume praising the local landowner and benevolent factory
owner William McDowell, M.P., of Lochwinnoch, had been written
before he sought out McDowell’s patronage, and it earned Wilson
McDowell’s approval but no financial backing. Instead, Wilson had
to seek out most of the individual subscribers himself on his
travels as a chapman. He had 600 copies printed by Neilson of
Paisley, and then after publication he carried the books with him
for delivery. Burns’s Kilmarnock edition sold its 612 copies
immediately. Wilson found many of his 400 pre-publication
subscribers reluctant to pay up, and sales were disappointingly
slow.
Title-page from
Alexander Wilson, Poems (Paisley: Neilson for the Author,
1790)
G. Ross Roy Collection, University of South Carolina Libraries. The
image includes show-through from the other side of the page, which
has an engraved frontispiece illustration for Wilson’s historical
poem “Hardyknute.”
It certainly took
time for Wilson’s book to reach the attention of Robert Burns. The
first mention of Wilson’s book in Burns’s correspondence only comes
in January 1792. On January 25, Mrs. Dunlop wrote to Burns:
All this week I have
done nothing but read Wilson’s poems, which Jenny Little brought me
… their author, I am told, was really in the situation he
ludicrously enough describes of a travelling packman, and is now
actually an operative weaver in the little village of Lochwinnoch …
it is the only one of the many spurious progeny to which your genius
has given existence … that one is not ashamed to hear called
poetry. This is the product of a manly mind … I fear it will hurt
Jenny by comparison (Wallace II: 182-183)
“Jenny” of course,
was Mrs. Dunlop’s poetic protégée, Janet Little. Burns responded on
February 3, chiefly to write about new excise prospects, and to send
Mrs. Dunlop some smuggled brandy, but he also asked to borrow
Wilson’s book in a way that suggests he already knew something of
the author: “Wilson’s book I have not yet seen; but will be much
obliged to you for a sight of it” (Roy II: 132).
The young Alexander
Wilson: engraving from portrait by James Craw,
frontispiece to Grosart, vol. I (G. Ross Roy Collection).
But, despite the
financial loss on his book (about which Neilson the printer seems to
have been patient), Wilson developed a circle of friends in Paisley
who encouraged his poetic ambition. His poem “The Group” depicts
his friendship with the Paisley poets James Kennedy and Ebenezer
Picken, who in 1787 wrote what was probably the first of several
contemporary poetic responses to Burns, “The De’ils Answer to his
verra worthy frien’ Robert Burns” (Egerer 7; Jardine, p. xxvii; cf.
). In April 1791, along with Picken, Wilson entered a contest at an
Edinburgh debating society, The Pantheon, for poems about Burns’s
great predecessors Allan Ramsay and Robert Fergusson. The question
was “Whether have the Exertions of Allan Ramsay or Robert Ferguson
done more Honour to Scotch Poetry.” Wilson is said to have written
his 200-line poem, memorized it ready for the contest, and woven 50
yards of cloth to pay for his expenses getting to Edinburgh, all
within a week. Picken wrote a formal Augustan poem in praise of
Ramsay, while Wilson drew unanimous applause with his vernacular
poem on behalf of Fergusson:
My heart cry’d out,
while ears war drappan fast,
O Ramsay, Ramsay, art thou beat at last!
What he describes, before your een ye see’t
As plain and lively as ye see that peat.
It’s my opinion, John, that this young fallow,
Excell’s them a’, an’ beats auld Allan hallow,
And shews, at twenty-twa, as great a giftie
For painting just, as Allan did at fifty.…
Let ane and a’ here vote as they incline,
Frae heart and soul Rab Fergusson has mine.
Incidentally,
Wilson’s strategy in this poem, of presenting his case in the
vernacular and through the voice of a countryman uncontaminated by
the pretensions of the literati, was taken up by his friend Gavin
Turnbull in his prologue to Ramsay’s Gentle Shepherd
(Dumfries, 1793), written in Ramsay’s voice. In the event neither
Picken nor Wilson won the contest, because the winner was determined
by a vote of the audience, and some well-heeled Edinburgh poetaster
had bought up tickets and packed the house with friends. However,
Picken and Wilson published their poems together as a forty-page
quarto pamphlet, The Laurel Disputed (Edinburgh: Guthrie,
1791).
During this visit to Edinburgh,
banking on the publicity that the contest gave to his poetry, Wilson
arranged for Burns’s friend, the bookseller Peter Hill, to issue a
second edition of his poems as Poems, Humorous, Satirical and
Serious (Edinburgh: Hill, 1791). This added several additional poems
and an expanded version of his prose journal about life as a chapman.
Since the new poems occur at several points through the second half
of the book, Hill must have reprinted the entire book, not just
recycled unsold copies from 1790 with extra pages, as sometimes
thought. This new edition is said to have been a success, but if
current library holdings are any indication the expanded edition
sold even worse than the first one, and it seldom comes up in the
antiquarian book market. Unlike the 1790 version, it has even
escaped digitization.
Alongside his own
publications, though, Wilson was also keeping track of Burns’s.
Among the poems that Grosart notes as added in 1791 was an
anti-clerical “Ode for the Birthday of Our Immortal Scottish Poet,
Set to Music by a Baccanalian Club” (Grosart II: 77). The “Ode”
praises two specific Burns poems, “The Ordination,” and “The Holy
Fair,” as “glorious effusions,” tells Excisemen not to fear the
after-life as “All hell will befriend you for rare Robin Burns,” and
calls on the “nymphs of old Coila” to leave their “raw lifeless
clodpoles, your cows and your churns,” to “encore the great
sportsman, O “rare Robin Burns.” One stanza in particular gives the
flavor of Wilson’s enthusiasm:
Clear the road, ye
dull churchmen! Make way for our bard,
To whose tow’ring genius bo task is too hard;
Your glories, your precepts, your nonsense he spurns,
And Europe loud echoes, “O rare Robin Burns!”
The same month that
Wilson delivered his poem at the Pantheon, April 1791, was when
Burns’s “Tam o’ Shanter” was reprinted in two Edinburgh periodicals,
and Wilson was very struck by it. Jardine reports him as having
visited Burns “at his farm,” presumably Ellisland. Wilson had
apparently written a review of “Tam o’ Shanter” that he sent to
James Anderson’s The Bee, though Anderson refused to publish
it. Wilson then sent his review to Burns himself, and Jardine says
that Burns replied justifying his poem against Wilson’s comments (Jardine,
pp. xxvi-xxvii). Certainly, Wilson’s most successful poem, “Watty
and Meg,” published in 1792, shows the influence of Burns’s
verse-tale, or at least of its frame-narrarative, in its contrast
between alehouse camaraderie and domestic conflict. Wilson’s plot,
subsequently reused by Turnbull for his short play The Recruit
(Dumfries,1794), depicts Watty, a henpecked husband, hauled out
of the pub by Meg, his besom of a wife, but getting his revenge and
regaining marital ascendancy by preparing to enlist as a soldier and
leave her with the children:
Keen the frosty winds
were blawing,
Deep the snaw had wreathed the ploughs,
Watty, wearied a’ day sawing,
Daundert down to Mungo Blue’s …
Mungo fill’d him up a toothfu’,
Drank his health and Meg’s in ane;
Watty, puffing out a mouthfu’,
Pledged him wi’ a dreary grane…
Part of Wilson’s
success reportedly came from people thinking that his
anonymously-published poem had been written by Burns. Robert
Chambers recounts a story told by Burns’s widow, that Burns was
sitting at his desk by an open window, and heard a chapman crying up
his latest offering, “Watty and Meg, a new ballad by Robert Burns.”
“The poet looked out and said ‘That’s a lee, Andrew, but I would
make your plack a bawbee [double your money] if it were mine’”
(James Grant Wilson, p. 421 n). Perhaps because of this public
misperception, Wilson’s chapbook was a runaway success. Neilson was
able to recoup his losses from printing Wilson‘s earlier book and to
buy Wilson a new greatcoat. In due course, Burns’s own former
printer, John Wilson (no relative), by now operating a print-shop in
Ayr, produced a chapbook, Four Funny Tales, reprinting the
two poems together, along with Wilson’s “The Loss of the Pack,” and
an older tale by Allan Ramsay. Significantly, the John Wilson
title-page gave no hint that the two major poems were not by the
same author.
Four
Funny Tales
(Air: J. & P. Wilson, 1802)
(G. Ross Roy Collection).
Like Burns, in the
early 1790s, Wilson was restive under the increasing political
repression of Scotland, but Wilson was less careful, or less adroit,
than Burns in negotiating the dangers. Burtt and Davis summarize
this phase of Wilson’s Scottish experience quite well, but the
biographies by Cantwell, rather protectively, and Hunter, more
critically, deal with it in more detail, and provide the basis for
the summary here. (The actual writing that Wilson did in this phase
of his career is most thoroughly examined in Gerard Carruthers’s
forthcoming essay, mentioned above). One of Wilson’s first separate
publications had been a satirical poem The Hollander, or Light
Weight (Paisley: Neilson, 1790), which had accused a local
factory owner William Henry of shortchanging payment to his weavers.
Wilson also published a second similar satire, “Hab’s Door; or the
Temple of Terror.” These satires made Wilson a local hero, and they
also (not coincidentally) provided publicity for his forthcoming
book. Henry took out a summons against Wilson for libel, and, more
threateningly at that time, for “incitement to unrest.” Though
Wilson asserted that the poem did not refer to Henry, or that if it
did it was justified, these claims were soon rejected. Partly
because Wilson kept disappearing on his journeys selling chapbooks,
the case dragged on for the rest of the year, before being quietly
dropped.
But Wilson’s next
such effort had graver consequences. Egged on or used by cannier
local radicals, Wilson wrote another attack, on a different factory
owner, “The Shark, or Lang Mills Detected.” The poem starts by
praising the weavers’ contribution to Scottish economic improvement:
Ye weaver blades! Ye
noble chiels!
Wha fill our land wi’ plenty,
And mak our vera barest fiels
To wave wi’ ilka dainty…
But Wilson then goes
on to denounce the factory owner Shark/Sharp:
Wha cou’d believe a
chiel sae trig
|Wad cheat us o’ a bodle?
Or that sae fair a gowden wig
Contained sae black a noddle?
But Shark beneath a sleekest smile
Conceals his fiercest girning;
And, like his neighbours of the Nile,
Devours wi’ little warning
By night or day.
Indeed the poem
imagines Shark being hung and flogged and shot:
Kick out the
scoun’rel to his shift,
We’ll pay him for his sporting.
In May 1792, while
the new poem was still in manuscript, Wilson’s target William Sharp
received an anonymous letter threatening its publication if he did
not send five guineas to “A.B.,” c/o of Neilson the Paisley
printer. Sharp immediately petitioned the authorities against
“these highly libelous, incendiary and dangerous publications,” a
warrant was issued prohibiting publication, and Wilson was arrested
for libel and blackmail. He admitted that the letter was in his
handwriting, but at first he denied authorship of the poem. Then he
admitted authorship, but denied the poem referred to Sharp, a denial
that Sharp’s lawyer easily demolished. In June 1792, Wilson was
ordered to appear in court, to “beg pardon of God and the
complainer,” and to be imprisoned till he had paid a substantial
total of over £60 in damages, a fine, and costs. It didn’t help that
Wilson was off on his wanderings when the case was heard, and his
subsequent claim that he had asked a lawyer to represent him who had
also failed to show up was unavailing. He was fined another £10 and
had to get his brother-in-law to stand surety. Despite the Sheriff’s
warrant, the poem was then printed and circulated, and in January
1793, Wilson was imprisoned again in the Paisley Tolbooth, and
ordered to burn all copies of all three poems publicly, on the
Tolbooth steps. Additional small fines began to accumulate for
aggravating the offense. Though Wilson complained in court about
persecution (“the foolish and determined severity of a rigorous
prosecution”), Hunter suggests that neither Sharp nor the
authorities pushed their legal advantage to its limit.
But the screw was
tightening. In January 1794, the accusations against Wilson got
more dangerous, this time for writing and circulating an
advertisement for “the Friends of Liberty and Reform.” He denied the
charges, and amazingly, once he had found friends to stand surety
for an increased bond for his good behaviour, the authorities again
let him out. In the Scottish sedition trials of 1793, the
much-feared sentence was transportation to the new prison-settlement
of Botany Bay. If the authorities avoided making Wilson a political
martyr, it is hard not to believe that they also wanted him to go
away, to solve their problem by “self-transportation.”
In May 1794, out on
bail, and fearing that he would inevitably, sooner or later, face
charges of sedition, Wilson took passage across the Atlantic as a
deck passenger from Belfast to Delaware, a voyage that took nearly
two months. He knew no one. He was responsible for a young nephew
he’d brought with him. Yet, on the second day in America, as the
pair of them were walking away from Wilmington towards Philadelphia,
a brilliant plumaged bird caught Wilson’s eye, and the seed was
planted for his future career. Eventually he picked up some weaving
work near Philadelphia, where his imagination was fired by observing
great migratory flocks of ducks and geese. He met a fellow-Scot,
the engraver Alexander Lawson (1772-1846), from Lanarkshire, who had
himself emigrated for political reasons in 1793, and who would later
work on Wilson’s American Ornithology and on the
illustrations of the Lewis and Clark expedition. Wilson himself
trained and worked for a time as an engraver, and then found a
series of positions as a schoolteacher, where (as Burtt and Davis
reveal) he drew pictures of birds in his students’ exercises books
as a reward for good work. He put down a payment on a farm and sent
home for his sister and other family members. In 1804 he became an
American citizen. In 1806, Wilson took an editorial job with a
Philadelphia publisher, and in 1808 he published the first volume of
his great work on ornithology, completing nine volumes before his
death in 1813. He went on writing poetry, for respected American
magazines. Like Turnbull, Wilson did not collect these later
writings in volume form himself, but some of his American poems were
included in the posthumous edition of his work that was published in
London in 1816. Unlike Turnbull, Wilson does not seem after
emigration to have written any new poems in Scots.
For Burnsians, one of
Wilson’s American poems is of particular interest, because it
includes the only firsthand evidence that Wilson actually met
Burns. In 1801, another Philadelphia publisher, Thomas Dobson, had
issued a (pirated) American edition of James Currie’s four-volume
Works of Robert Burns. This required, not just resetting the
type of Currie’s edition, but a re-engraving by Wilson’s friend
Alexander Lawson of the famous frontispiece portrait from Currie,
which itself was already a re-engraving, with elaborations, from the
Nasmyth-Beugo portrait for the 1787 Edinburgh edition.
Frontispiece from
“Mr. Dobson’s edition”:
Robert Burns, engraved by Alexander Lawson after Nasmyth, in
Works of Robert Burns, 4 vols.
(Philadelphia: Printed by Budd and Bartram for Thomas Dobson, 1801)
[Egerer 64]
When he saw the
portrait of Burns that his friend Lawson had produced, Wilson was
both impressed and moved. He wrote a poem about Lawson’s portrait,
which was first published in the Literary Magazine and American
Register (Philadelphia: J. Conrad), 5:6 (June, 1806): 477-478:
ON SEEING THE
PORTRAIT OF ROBERT BURNS
ADDRESSED TO THE ARTIST
Yes, it is he
! The hapless, well-known Burns;
His looks, his air,
his very soul exprest;
That heaven-taught
bard whom weeping Genius mourns,
For cold in earth his
silent relics rest.
Through tears that
ease the anguish of my heart,
I view this faithful
image of my friend;
And vainly wish, dear
Lawson, that thy art
Could life once more
to these lov’d features lend.
Who sees not here, in
this expressive eye,
The independent soul,
the ardent mind;
The boundless fancy,
Pity’s generous sigh,
The heart to all but
its possessor kind.
Alas ! I knew him
when his country’s pride,
Yet left dark
Poverty’s cold winds to brave;
And those who then
the friendly hand deny’d,
Now strew with
flowers his green unconscious grave.
The dear, remember’d
scenes we oft have seen,
The burnies, haughs,
and knows of yellow broom,
The hazel-glen, the
birk-surrounded linn,
The blossom’d
heather, and the hawthorn’s bloom.
The simple tales of
Scotia’s hardy swains,
The loves and sports
their circling seasons bring;
Who now will
celebrate in equal strains?
What bard like Burns
will ever, ever sing?
O he was Nature’s
genuine warbler born,
Too early lost, from
pensive Scotia tore;
Death snatch’d him
from us in life’s early dawn,
Ere half the raptures
of his song were o’er.
Thus soars the
thrilling lark at dawn of day,
Sweet to each
list’ning swain her warblings flow;
And thus the hawk
sweeps down upon his prey,
And leaves the world
in solitude below.
A.W.
Gray’s Ferry, April
25, 1806.
(Grosart, II: 358-359)
It is an interesting
poem in at least three ways. First, it provides a direct statement
that Wilson had met Burns and remembered what he had looked like.
Second, its imagery of the poet as bird, and poetry as bird-song,
unites Wilson’s two enthusiasms. Third, it exemplifies the
bitter-sweet tone of exile poetry, looking back not only on “dear
remember’d scenes,” but “dark Poverty’s cold winds,” in a Scotland
that Wilson, Lawson, and Turnbull had all left in the 1790s for good
reason. It may well be one of the better among the many poetic
tributes paid to Burns in the years after his death (cf. Roy, “The
mair they talk”).
What might have been
Burns’s future if, in the mid-1790s, he, like Turnbull and Wilson,
had emigrated to the United States? Would he have settled in one
place as Turnbull and Wilson did, or would he have moved on, as so
many Scots immigrants did, down through Virginia to the Carolina
upcountry, or on to Kentucky or Tennessee or north Georgia? Burns
was a farmer, not a weaver, and he had already rescued and improved
two farms in Scotland. Would he have stayed with farming, and gone
south and west to find land to clear, or like Turnbull and Wilson
would he have found that, even without much formal education, a
Scottish upbringing had given him the skills and talents that would
open up some new career that would have been closed to him in
Scotland? Like Turnbull and Wilson, would he have gone on writing
poetry?
In a poem about
Scottish emigration, “The Tears of Britain,” apparently written
before he emigrated but first published in an American periodical,
Wilson presciently portrays the exiles of his generation, people
like himself and Turnbull, as a real loss to the country that let
them go:
Down yonder rough
beach, where the vessels attend,
I see the sad
emigrants slowly descend;
Compell’d by the
weight of oppression and woe,
Their kindred, and
native, and friends to forego,
In these drooping
crowds that depart every day
I see the true
strength of the State glide away,
While countries that
hail the glad strangers to shore
Shall flourish when
Britain’s proud pomp is no more. (Grosart II: 213).
Of course, we can’t
know what would have happened to an emigrant Burns. But the
contrasted and intertwined stories of the three young poets from the
west of Scotland, one who stayed and two who crossed the Atlantic,
are nonetheless instructive, thought-provoking, and in some ways
inspiring. They remind us of the close ties between Scotland and
America, and that the Scottish heritage has at its best always been
not only about the past but about the future.
References
Altenberg, Karin,
“Beyond the Bald Eagle” [review of Burtt and Davis],” Wall Street
Journal, June 21, 2013.
Burtt, Edward H.,
Jr., and William E. Davis Jr., Alexander Wilson, The Scot Who
Founded American Ornithology (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University
Press, 2013).
Cantwell, Robert,
Alexander Wilson: Naturalist and Pioneer (Philadelphia:
Lippincott, 1961).
Carruthers, Gerard,
“Robert Burns’s Scots Poetry Contemporaries,” in Burns and Other
Poets, ed. David Sergeant and Fiona Stafford (Edinburgh:
Edinburgh University Press, 2012): 38-52.
_______________,
“Alexander Wilson: the Rise and Fall and Rise of a Labouring-Class
Writer,” in John Goodridge & Bridget Keegan, eds., The Cambridge
History of Working-Class Literature (Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press, forthcoming, 2016).
Cowan, Edward J.,
“Chapman Billies and their Books,” Studies in Scottish Literature,
35-36 (2007): 6-25;
http://scholarcommons.sc.edu/ssl/vol35/iss1/3/
_______________, and
Mike Paterson, Folk in Print. Scotland’s Chapbook Heritage,
1750-1850 (Edinburgh: John Donald, 2007).
[Crichton, Thomas],
“Memoir of Wilson” and “Biographical Sketch of Alexander Wilson,” in
The Weaver [Paisley], vol. 1 (May-August 1819) and vol. 2
(1819).
Ewing, J.C., ed.,
Robert Burns’s Literary Correspondents, 1786-1796: a
chronological list of letters addressed to the poet, with precises
of their contents (Alloway: Burns Monument Trustees, 1938).
Grosart, Alexander,
ed., The Poems and Literary Prose of Alexander Wilson, the
American Ornithologist, 2 vols. (Paisley: Gardner, 1876).
Jardine, William,
“Life of Wilson,” in Alexander Wilson and Charles Lucien Bonaparte,
American Ornithology; or the Natural History of the Birds of the
United States, 3 vols. (London: Whittaker, Treacher & Arnot;
Edinburgh: Stirling & Kenney, 1832).
Hunter, Clark, ed.,
The Life and Letters of Alexander Wilson [Memoirs of the
American Philosophical Society, vol. 154] (Philadelphia:
American Philosophical Society, 1983).
Leonard, Tom, ed.,
Radical Renfrew: Poetry from the French Revolution to World War I
(Edinburgh: Polygon, 1990).
Ord, George, “Sketch
of the Life of Alexander Wilson,“ in American Ornithology, 9
(Philadelphia: Bradford and Inskip, 1814):enlarged and reprinted as
a separate volume, Philadelphia: Hall, 1828.
Paterson, James,
The Contemporaries of Burns, and the More Recent Poets of Ayrshire
(Edinburgh: Hugh Paton, etc., 1840).
Paxton, Robert O.,
“The Founding Birdman” [review of Burtt and Davis], New York
Review of Books, October 10, 2013.
Purdie, David,
Kirsteen McCue, and Gerard Carruthers, ed., Maurice Lindsay’s
Burns Encyclopaedia, 4 ed., revised (London: Rober Hale, 2013).
Roy, G. Ross, ed.,
Letters of Robert Burns, 2nd ed., 2 vols. (Oxford:
Clarendon Press, 1985).
____________,
“‘The mair
they talk, I’m kend the better’: Poems about
Robert Burns to 1859,” in
Kenneth Simpson, ed.,
Love and Liberty: Robert Burns,
A Bicentenary
Celebration
(East Linton: Tuckwell, 1997), 53-68.
Scott, Patrick,
“Wilson’s American Ornithology,” Audubon and Others, an
exhibition for the University of South Carolina Bicentenary
(Columbia, SC: Thomas Cooper Library, April-August 2001), island 6:
http://library.sc.edu/spcoll/audubon/audubon6.html
___________,
“Whatever Happened to Gavin Turnbull? Hunting Down a Friend of
Robert Burns in South Carolina,” Robert Burns Lives! 159
(November 28, 2012):
http://www.electricscotland.com/familytree/frank/burns_lives159.htm
___________ and
Joseph DuRant, “Looking Again at James Currie’s Inventory: the Other
Side of Robert Burns’s Correspondence,” Robert Burns Lives!
207 (December 10, 2014):
http://www.electricscotland.com/familytree/frank/burns_lives207.htm
__________, ed., A
Bard Unkend: Selected Poems in the Scottish Dialect, by Gavin
Turnbull (Columbia, SC: Scottish Poetry Reprints, 2015).
__________, John
Knox, and Rachel Mann, eds., The Collected Poems of Gavin
Turnbull Online (Columbia, SC: Centre for Digital Humanities &
University of South Carolina Libraries, 2015):
http://lichen.csd.sc.edu/turnbull/home
Stauffer, David
McNeely, “Alexander Lawson,” in his American Engravers Upon
Copper and Steel: Biographical Sketches, Illustrated (New York:
the Grolier Club, 1907; repr. New York: Burt Franklin, 1964),
156-158.
Wallace, William,
ed., Robert Burns and Mrs. Dunlop: Correspondence Now published
in full for the first time, 2 vols. (New York: Dodd, Mead,
1898).
Wilson, Alexander,
Poems (Paisley: Neilson, 1790).
_______________,
Poems Humorous, Satirical and Serious (Edinburgh: P. Hill for
the Author, 1791).
_______________, “On Seeing the Portrait of Robert Burns, Addressed
to the Artist,” Literary Magazine and American Register
(Philadelphia: J. Conrad), 5:6 (June, 1806): 477-478.
_______________,
Poems, Chiefly in the Scottish Dialect (London: Longman, 1816).
_______________, and
Ebenezer Picken, The Laurel Disputed; Or, the Merits of Allan
Ramsay and Robert Ferguson <sic> Contrasted in Two Poetical
Essays (Edinburgh: Guthrie, 1791).
Wilson, James Grant,
“Alexander Wilson,” in his The Poets and Poetry of Scotland,
2 vols. in 4 (London: Blackie, 1871), II: 418-427.
Wilson, James
Southall, Alexander Wilson, Poet-Naturalist (New York and
Washington: Neale, 1906).
Wilson Ornithological
Society: website at:
http://www.wilsonsociety.org/
|